Thursday, March 22, 2012

Peer Critique for ANA


Voice/Tone: Ana’s voice was laid back. She informed in her paper on why people are homeless.

Audience: I think her audience was targeted to young adults and adults as well. Trying to get her point across to them that being homeless is a serious issue.

Evidence: Ana did use some resources, but the way it was used wasn’t used as well as I would’ve have seen it be used. I think She should have used her information to compare the pros and cons of poverty.

Meaning: The meaning that Ana was trying to say was that being homeless is serious. She explains what drove people to that point and did it great.

Structure: the way it was constructed was well. This paper was suppose to be on the other hand an exploratory essay in which the paper doesn’t side. I think she did that very well, but she did not inform the reader the pros and cons of the issue.

Organization: I would have liked for her to not talk as much about her experience volunteering and rather have used that experience as a resource to her paper adding to the pros and cons of the issue Ana was trying to explain.

Overall: overall I think she told the point she was trying to get across excellent. I want to see more good and bad sides to the issue she was talking about.

No comments:

Post a Comment